Wallets, Nodes & Infrastructure

Crypto infrastructure fails differently from ordinary web infrastructure: a stalled node means missed deposits, a bad upgrade can fork you off the network, and “we’ll restore from backup” has consequences when money is involved. We run this class of systems for our own ecosystem — here is how an infrastructure engagement typically unfolds.

Phase 0 — Assessment

We start by reading what you have: chains, wallets, node versions, hosting, backup story, and the failure that worries you most. You get a short written assessment with concrete risks and a proposed target architecture — useful even if the engagement stops there.

Phase 1 — Deployment

Nodes, explorers, indexers, wallet backends, and APIs deployed on your servers or dedicated hosts you control. Everything is reproducible: configuration in a repository, documented bootstrap, no snowflake servers that only one contractor understands.

Phase 2 — Observability

Before we call anything “done,” it reports on itself: block height lag, peer count, disk headroom, API latency, wallet balance thresholds. Alerts go to your team’s channels — Telegram, ADAMANT, email — with runbooks for the common cases.

Phase 3 — Operations

Chain upgrades and hard forks applied on schedule, dependencies patched, capacity reviewed. We offer ongoing maintenance contracts, or we hand over cleanly to your team with documentation and training — self-hosted means you are never locked in.

Built from parts we run ourselves

ipfs-node is our distributed-storage node, used where files do not belong on a blockchain. currencyinfo is a self-hosted crypto and fiat rates service — the kind of boring, critical dependency production systems quietly rely on. Both are open source, both run in our own infrastructure today.

The standard we hold

We maintain what we build. That matters when your nodes, wallets, and APIs must stay online for years — not just demo well in a pitch deck.