Security, Review & Hardening

Security work grounded in a decade of running crypto infrastructure — not checkbox compliance theater. We review the places where crypto systems actually bleed: key handling, dependency chains, and the gap between “works” and “fails safely.”

What we review

• Application and Node.js crypto backend code, with priority on funds-touching paths
• Dependency tree and supply chain: install scripts, typosquats, unpinned versions, abandoned packages
• API and exchange key handling: permissions, storage, rotation, and who can read them
• Secrets management: environment leakage, logs, CI variables, backup exposure
• Infrastructure and network exposure: what is listening, what is public that should not be
• CI/CD and deployment paths: who and what can push code that moves money
• Logging and monitoring: whether you would even notice the compromise

How the review runs

1. Threat model first. One session to map what an attacker actually wants from your system — hot wallet drain, key theft, order manipulation — so review depth follows real risk, not file order.
2. Review. Manual code and configuration review by engineers who ship crypto backends, supported by tooling but never reduced to a scanner dump.
3. Report. Findings ranked by exploitability and impact, each with a concrete fix — file, line, and suggested change, not “consider improving security.”
4. Fix verification. After your team patches (or we do), we re-check the findings and confirm closure in writing.

Why this team

We created and still operate security-sensitive ADAMANT infrastructure — wallets, nodes, bots, and payment flows that have run in a hostile environment for years. Findings come from operating experience, not from a generic AppSec template.

What we do not sell

No rubber-stamp certificates, no fear-based upsells, no custody of your keys. If your system is in good shape, the report will say so — a short honest report is a better outcome than a padded one.